An annotated literature review on

DEMAND RESPONSE AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN BUILDINGS


This document presents an annotated list of papers selected from those that I have reviewed during my research activity. The addressed topics are related to Demand Response and energy management for buildings. The list includes presentations, technical reports, and articles from journals and conferences. Web links are also provided.

-          Smart Grid: architectures and frameworks

-          Energy management for buildings

-          Demand Side Management

-          Household energy consumption models

-          Scheduling

-          Miscellaneous

-          Smart Grid, Demand Response, Smart Appliances, and related technologies: white papers and technical reports


Smart Grid: architectures and frameworks

The power grid is an extremely complex system requiring assurance that electricity is generated in the exact moment that is consumed. In order to meet this requirement in a more efficient way, energy system operators are investing in advances in the field of ICT. In particular, the so-called two-way communication technologies are enabling new control and monitoring functionalities, thus renewing the production, transportation, and distribution of electricity. As a consequence, is taking place an important discussion on how those new technologies should be integrated in the future Smart Grid architecture.

  1. B. Nordman, “Networks in buildings: which path forward?”, Proceedings of the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, August 2008. This paper focuses on long-term actions that need to be taken in order to improve energy efficiency in buildings. In a future scenario, network capabilities should enable devices to interoperate with each other and with people in an intelligent way. The Author presents the lessons learned from the relation between networks and consumer electronics, and higher-layer requirements for network infrastructure regarding interoperability and standardization. An extension to OSI model for building networks is proposed (Transport, Concepts, Applications, and User Interface).
  2. W. Frye, ”Smart grid: transforming the electricity system to meet future demand and reduce greenhouse gas emissions”, Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group, November 2008. This white paper provides an introduction on the Smart Grid. It presents the problems of the actual grid, the requirements for the future Smart Grid, the benefits, and the entities involved in the development process. The Smart Grid components are described: demand management (demand response, dynamic pricing, smart meters, load management, smart devices, monitoring, green IT), distributed generation, transmission and distribution management.
  3. M. A. Piette, S. Kiliccote, and G. Ghatikar, “Linking Continuous Energy Management and Open Automated Demand Response”, Report LBNL-1361E, Proceedings of the Grid Interop Forum, Atlanta, November 2008. The Authors, within the Open Auto-DR Alliance, present a framework to classify different types of Energy Management programs on the basis of the required level of automation and the reference timescale during which the load is controlled. Examples on lighting systems are given.
  4. M. M. He, E. M. Reutzel, X. Jiang, R. H. Katz, S. R. Sanders, D. E. Culler, and K. Lutz, “An architecture for local energy generation, distribution, and sharing”, Proceedings of the IEEE Energy 2030 Conference, November 2008. This paper proposes the LoCal grid, an electric grid architecture that aims at solving the problems of the current grid. LoCal is a peer-to-peer technology based on the concept of “packetized energy” (that introduces the routing of energy). It relies on energy storage technologies and Intelligent Power Switches to coordinate the needs of the nodes (management of the local generation; interaction with other nodes and with the grid).
  5. A. Capone, M. Barros, H. Hrasnica, and S. Tompros, “A new architecture for reduction of energy consumption of home appliances", Proceedings of the European conference TOWARDS eENVIRONMENT, March 2009. The Authors were supported by the AIM Consortium. They propose a Smart Grid hierarchical framework that involves residential users, network operators, and energy utilities. The reference architecture includes an AIM Gateway, the relative interfaces towards outdoor networks, and several Energy Management Devices to control building devices. The paper also presents usage scenarios.
  6. A. Ipakchi, F Albuyeh, “Grid of the Future”, Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 52-62, April 2009. This article focuses on the needs behind the transformation towards the Smart Grid: environmental issues, need for a reliable supply of electricity, the charging of electric vehicles, integration of intermittent renewable resources, energy storage, and Demand Response programs. The Authors conclude that new ITC technologies will ease the innovation process.

7.      B. Nordman, “The Case Against the Smart Grid”, presentation and video available on YouTube, October 2009. This presentation (slides are available here) addresses several architectural issues related to the evolving of the Smart Grid. The Author’s thesis is that the choices made today will have a great influence on tomorrow’s energy consumption in residential and commercial buildings. Lessons can be learned from development of the Internet. Architectural principles are: the interoperability of devices, distributed architecture, price information used as Demand Respond control signals, and the focus on end users and user interfaces. An important assertion is that “the Smart Grid should not extend through the meter” into buildings, so the load control has to be implemented locally.

8.      N. Gershenfeld, S. Samouhos, B. Nordman, “Intelligent infrastructure for energy efficiency”, Science, AAAS, Vol. 327, pp. 1086-1088, 26 February 2010. In this short article, architectural concepts from the Internet are imported to the proposed Intelligent Infrastructure for Energy Efficiency (I2E), an energy management test bed made of nodes (of 1 $ cost) with interfaces for: sensors, IPv6 network, and loads. The Authors state that the management intelligence should be placed into devices in order to obtain a distributed and scalable infrastructure.

9.      B. NordmanNanogrids: Evolving our electricity systems from the bottom up”, Environmental Energy Technologies Division - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, May. 2010. This paper proposes the Nanogrid paradigm as an alternative to the Smart Grid “top-down” approach that adopts the point of view of the grid. Nanogrids extend the concept of Micorgrid and their goal is to improve energy utilization. They are defined as administrative domains that include loads, a controller (that provides or denies power to loads), gateways (for communication and price-based power exchange with other –grids), but no sources (which may be connected to a single Nanogrid). The Nanogrid concepts are recognizable in current technologies like USB, Power over Ethernet, and vehicles.

10.  B. NordmanBeyond the Smart Grid: Building Networks”, Environmental Energy Technologies Division - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, May. 2010. Illustrates the characteristics of building networks and their relation with the Smart Grid. Devices need to adjust their operation according to consumer’s preferences, in particular regarding the way they respond to price changes. The point of view of building networks is compared with that of the Smart Grid. The role of the meter, besides measuring, should be limited to communicating pricing information and two-way communication functionalities should be only used for charging electric vehicles. The adoption of dynamic pricing is not sufficient to guarantee the needed level of dynamism for load consumption adjustment, but it is a necessary change to improve the pricing model.

  1. K. Wacks, “Open Energy Management Architecture”, iHomes & Buildings, CABA, pp. 16-19, Spring 2010. Focuses on the growing market of energy services. The Smart Grid is divided into three domains: utility, customer, and energy management. To foster a competitive market of management services, utilities should provide standard real time access to meter data and price. A set of other guiding principles for Demand Response is provided, for each domain.

Energy management for buildings

The following articles are related to Demand Side Management technique. The first subsection is dedicated to energy management frameworks for DSM within buildings. The second one presents papers that deal with the control of smart devices. Finally, some papers related to behavior modification are listed.

Energy management frameworks

1.      M. Hatori, “Peak-Shift Methods for Notebook Computers”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp. 117-121, May 2004. This paper presents a peak shift method that employs the electricity storage capacity of notebook batteries and uses a power management tool to switch AC power. The implementation of the proposed system in real devices is illustrated, together with relevant test results that show the achieved peak shift effect.

2.      T. Rausch, P. Palensky, “PROFESY: intelligent global energy management”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES 05), pp. 59-64, September 2005. This paper focuses on load management for large energy costumers, aiming at peak reduction. The reference scenario is a single customer that has multiple loads deployed in different sites. The load profile of each site is locally managed by a Maximum Demand Monitor (MDM). PROFESY is a Java based software that implements load prediction algorithms based on artificial intelligence and statistic processing, in order to globally coordinate the customer’s local MDMs by sending scheduling information.

3.      K. Wacks, “Energy Management Rediscovered”, iHomes & Buildings, CABA, pp. 10-12, Spring 2007. This article presents the concepts of DSM. A use case highlights the importance of user interfaces: consumption information messages are shown on the appliance display to let the consumer decide the best schedule on the basis of the service delay and cost. A domestic energy management system for remote load control is presented, which consists of a centralized controller that schedules appliances according to control signals received by a Utility Gateway.

4.      F. Kupzog, C Roesener, “A closer look on load management”, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp. 1151-1156, November 2007. This article focuses on the load shift potential of thermal appliances. Two different methods are proposed: varying the temperature set-point variation in order to pre-charge or post-charge the thermal appliance (before or after the load reduction); switching the appliance on and/or off in case the set-point is not accessible. A model for inert thermal processes is proposed by which system losses due to DSM are analyzed.

5.      M. LeMay, R. Nelli, G. Gross, and C. A. Gunter, “An integrated architecture for demand response communications and control”, Proceedings of the 41st Annual IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '08), Waikola, Hawaii, January 2008. This paper presents the Meter Gateway Architecture, a framework that integrates Building Automation System and Advanced Meter Infrastructure technologies in order to implement DSM functionalities. The proposed architecture is centralized and the main component is the Unified Hub, which provides control and communication (ZigBee is the reference technology). The hub receives utility price signals in real time by the Smart Meter. The signals are then relayed to the building appliances that may control themselves (Smart Appliances) or delegate the DR controls to the hub. The Authors present a prototype and test results that show the effectiveness of DR automated control for the charging of laptop battery and the operation cycle of an air conditioner.

6.      K. Wacks, “Home Area Networks for Electricity Demand Management”, iHomes & Buildings, CABA, pp. 15-17, Summer 2008. This article focuses on the development of technologies for residential DSM systems. The Author’s opinion is that the energy management architecture should be based on a centralized controller, separated from the Smart Meter.

7.      M. LeMay, J. J. Haas, and C.A. Gunter, “Collaborative recommender systems for building automation”, Proceedings of the 42nd Annual IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '09), Waikola, Hawaii, January 2009. This paper resents a Building Automation System for the energy management of building devices. The objective is to maximize the user comfort while complying with energy consumption constraints. The system is based on a blackboard architectural pattern and relies on a collaborative recommender. According to ratings given by building managers, the recommender selects among multiple building control algorithms the more suitable ones to be installed in the blackboard. The system includes appliance usage detectors, set point generators, sensors, usage predictors, and other components. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the recommender and how the system is capable of determining what appliances are in use by analyzing the aggregated consumption.

8.      A. Molderink, V. Bakker, M.G.C. Bosman, J. L. Hurink, G.J.M. Smit, “A three-step methodology to improve domestic energy efficiency”, Proceedings of Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), January 2010. This paper introduces the current research for improving energy efficiency of power systems (distributed generation, energy storage, and DSM solutions to enable peak shaving, virtual power plants, and Microgrids) and presents a general management methodology for residential DSM that consists of the following steps: the system predicts the energy demand of single houses (offline) with neural network approach; a global controller aggregates the individual load profiles (offline) and generates a global planning; the local schedulers of each house schedule the appliances in real time on the basis of the global planning. A performance evaluation based on prototypes proves the effectiveness of the methodology.

9.      A Misra, H Schulzrinne, “Policy-Driven Distributed and Collaborative Demand Response in Multi-Domain Commercial Buildings”, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Energy-Efficient Computing and Networking, Passau, Germany, April 2010. The Authors state the need to go beyond the current model of energy management based on a central controller (inadequate to manage multi-domain environments such as commercial buildings) and on static device configuration (inadequate to manage a large set of devices). DRACHMA is an architectural framework for decentralized DR in which devices organize themselves in autonomic domains. Each domain has a controller in charge of negotiating the needed DR adaptation actions. This is done according to the aggregate consumption and policies of the particular domain.

10.  T. J. Lui, W. Stirling, H. O. Marcy, “Get Smart”, Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp. 66-78, May 2010. The paper focuses on the integration of Smart Appliances into the Smart Grid. The Whirlpool Smart Device Network (WSDN) is a DR architecture that includes both the Home Area Network and the Smart Grid domains. WSDN proposes three levels of DR operation: (1) appliances individually respond to signals; (2) the operation of all smart devices (appliances, micro generation, EV chargers) is coordinated by a home energy management system; (3) the Smart Grid coordinates the DR of the houses (through the Internet, since the technology of Smart Meters does not offer sufficient bandwidth yet). Consumers should ultimately control how appliances response to the DR signals. The networking technology and the functional blocks of the home energy management system are described. The appliances are managed by a centralized Smart Device Controller that also operates as gateway towards the Smart Grid. The paper also provides typical load profiles of several appliances.

11.  J. Xiao, J. Y. Chung, J. Li, R. Boutaba, J W. Hong, “Near Optimal Demand-Side Energy Management Under Real-time Demand-Response Pricing”, POSTECH University, Pohang, South Korea, 2010. The Authors focus on DSM and formulate a scheduling problem for daily consumption tasks characterized by deadlines and a given power demand. The objectives are peak shaving and cost minimization. The reference DR program is based on Local Control through Real Time Pricing signals (the most economically efficient solution). The scheduling is analytically formulated as a min-max problem (NP-hard, since it is a particular case of a well-known problem). The proposed algorithm is based on the Longest Process Time greedy search algorithm, but processes the task with the largest energy consumption first according to the cumulative cost of each timeslot. Through the analytical formulation, the Author proves that the algorithm finds near optimal solutions. The benefits of energy storage are also considered. Simulation results prove that the system achieves peak shaving.

12.  A-H. Mohsenian-Rad, V.W.S. Wong, J. Jatskevich, R. Schober, “Optimal and Autonomous Incentive-based Energy Consumption Scheduling Algorithm for Smart Grid”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, January 2010. The paper resents a DSM scheduler for domestic energy consumption (Smart Appliances and EV charging) to be implemented into Smart Meters. The reference scenario is a ToU DR program that controls the aggregated consumption of multiple houses. The scheduler is distributed (implemented locally in each Smart Meters of the controlled domain) and collaborative (the local algorithm relies on the knowledge of the current overall schedule of the domain). The Authors present an analytical formulation of the problem based on Game Theory. The distributed algorithm aims at reducing the total energy cost and the peak to average ratio. Thanks to the analytical formulation, it is shown that the system reaches the global optimum when the local algorithm reaches the local optimum. Simulation results prove cost and peak reductions.

13.  J. Howard, H. Ham, N. F. Maxemchuk, “Smart Air Conditioners”, Proceedings of the Global Smart Grid Symposium, US-Korea Conference on Science, Technology, and Entrepreneurship (UKC), August 2010. This paper focuses on the scheduling of periodic appliances (such as refrigerators and air conditioners) through the control of their duty cycles. The proposed algorithm (Tetris-like) sets the phase of the tasks related to a common time period in order to achieve peak shaving. A simulation-based evaluation compares the algorithm results in terms of peak reduction with a lower bound given by the average consumption. The Authors present the problem of how to reduce the cooling of multiple air conditioners in a fair manner and propose a max-min approach based on temperature.

Smart Appliances and electric vehicle charging systems

1.      M. Newborough, S. D. Probert, “Intelligent automatic electrical-load management for networks of major domestic appliances”, Applied Energy, Elsevier, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp. 151-168, 1990. The paper’s thesis is that peak demand may be reduced by the introduction of intelligent load-management facilities. The Authors presents the problem of energy balance and the influence of domestic consumption on the peak demand, for which several statistics are given. Benefits can be achieved by increasing the energy efficiency of appliances. Load management can be implemented through home automation. Appliances are classified by the required level of automation for domestic load management.

2.      A. Schmidt and K. Van Laerhoven, “How to build smart appliances?”, IEEE Personal Communications, Vol. 1070-9916/01, pp. 66-71, August 2001. The paper focuses on several issues on context awareness (the relation between the real world and the data provided by sensors). The Authors provide a terminology on context awareness (situational context, sensor data, context, context-aware application) and define smart devices as those that “are not ignorant about their environment and context.” A layered architecture to build context-aware devices is presented.

3.      A. Harris, “Charge of the electric car”, Engineering & Technology, IET Journals, pp. 52-53, 2009. This short article deals with the “ability of the UK power grid to support the growth of electric cars.” The Author presents the results of two different studies. The first study concludes that the electrification of the vehicle fleet will be manageable, but localized problems may arise, in particular in areas of high concentration of EVs. The second study affirms that EVs will contribute to the long-term reduction of the UK’s CO2 emissions.

4.      T. Reddoch, “Marrying Electric Transportation to the Electric System: EVSEs and Distribution Impacts”, Electric Power Research Institute presentation for Moving Ahead 2010, May 2010. The slides of this presentation focus on the EV market (a forecast chart for the EV adoption in California in the 2010-2020 decade is presented), charging technologies, and on the impact of EV charging on the power system. The EV charging can “alleviate issues related to night time over generation.” Smart Grid functionalities will manage the charging (Smart Charging). Time of Use rates help mitigate the sensitivity to overloads.

Behavior modification

1.      T. Ueno, F. Sano, O. Saeki, K. Tsuji, “Effectiveness of an energy-consumption information system on energy savings in residential houses based on monitored data”, Applied Energy, Elsevier, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp. 166-183, February 2006. This paper focuses on the effects of consumption awareness on energy savings. An information system has been deployed in 9 households and power consumption data has been collected. The results show how the information system led to a 9% consumption reduction and other beneficial behavior changes.

2.      G. Wood, M. Newborough, “Energy-use information transfer for intelligent homes: Enabling energy conservation with central and local displays”, Energy and Buildings, Elsevier, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp. 495-503, April 2007. This article focus on energy consumption displays. Methods to motivate consumers to save energy are presented, such as comparative data, goal settings, and rewards. The Authors classify appliances regarding the consumption information to be displayed.

3.      W. Abrahamse, L. Stega, C. Vleka, and T. Rothengatter, “The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Elsevier, Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 265-276, December 2007. This paper presents a study on the influence of tailored information, individual feedback about energy savings, and goal setting over 189 households for 5 months. The information was provided by a web site. The analyzed outcome, regarding energy savings and changes in energy utilization, was compared to that obtained from a control group. Results show a 5.1% consumption reduction.

Demand Side Management

Insights on the electricity market are needed to understand the mechanisms of Demand Response. The main problem relies on the old pricing model, by which consumers are used to pay averaged tariff prices while the real energy cost significantly varies on an hour basis.

  1. S. Deering, M. Newborough, S. D. Probert, “Rescheduling electricity demands in domestic buildings”, Applied Energy, Elsevier, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp. 1-62, 1993. The paper focuses on the utilization of electricity in the domestic sector in UK. It explains the importance of power peak demand and analyzes off-peak tariffs for space heating offered in the UK during the 1970s. Solutions for satisfying the fluctuations of the demand are presented: spinning reserves, peak-load plants (gas turbines) and facilities (pumped hydroelectric night storage). The Author presents the characteristics of demand profiles and Demand Side Management strategies and states that domestic demand rescheduling is a viable method to achieve peak reduction, but it requires intelligent controls based on price signals. Load profiles and characteristics of appliances are illustrated.
  2. H. Fraser, “The importance of an active demand side in the electricity industry”, The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, Volume 14, Issue 9, pp. 52-73, November 2001. This paper introduces the economics theory of the electricity industry. The old “vertical integration” model (where central planners set the generation capacity levels, which is an inefficient solution) and the new market-based one are presented. The problems related to transitioning to the new model are analyzed. The market-based model relies on energy prices to achieve reliability (expressed as outage probability) and short-run efficiency in production and consumption. To work properly, effective Demand Response mechanisms are needed: consumers must be charged on an hourly basis and vary consumption with a certain level of responsiveness according to marginal prices (active demand side). If Demand Response is inadequate, socialized reliability solutions (such as installed reserve margins) become necessary.
  3. J. Abaravicius, “Load management in residential buildings: considering techno-economical and environmental aspects”, PhD thesis, Division of Energy Economics and Planning, Department of Heat and Power Engineering, Lund University, 2004. Focuses on load demand management in the residential sector. The Author presents the load demand in Sweden and characterizes load management techniques. An experimental analysis on 10 households is presented with the objective of evaluating the economic benefits of load management.
  4. M.H. Albadi, E.F. El-Saadany, “A summary of demand response in electricity markets”, Electric Power Systems Research, Elsevier, Volume 78, Issue 11, pp. 1989-1996, November 2008. This paper presents Demand Response motivations and a classification of DR programs that divides them into incentive (such as Direct Control, Demand Biding, and Emergency DR) and price based programs (Time of Use, Critical Peak Pricing, Extreme Day CPP, Extreme Day Pricing, Real Time Pricing). Benefits (cost savings for consumers, price reduction due to efficiency increase, and market improvements such as price volatility reductions) and costs (related to participants and the program owner) are reported. A simulation based case study on performance evaluation of DR programs (measured by peak load reduction and demand elasticity) is presented.
  5. I. Stadler, “Power grid balancing of energy systems with high renewable energy penetration by demand response”, Utilities Policy, Elsevier, Vol. 16(2), pp. 90-98, June 2008. The Author focuses on services (storage heating, ventilation, refrigeration, heating, and SHP) that could store energy in a more efficient way than electricity storage and implement peak shift programs. Dynamic pricing and the automation of devices could influence user consumption behavior and achieve shift savings.
  6. G. Strbac, “Demand side management: Benefits and challenges”, Energy Policy, Elsevier, Volume 36, Issue 12, pp. 4419-4426, December 2008. Electricity demand is characterized by load diversity (expressed by the coincidence factor), which has a major impact in the way distribution networks balance generation and consumption of energy. A side effect of DSM techniques can be the reduction of load diversity and the consequent increase of the aggregated consumption. Thanks to advances in ICT, DSM could improve the distribution networks and the management of distributed generation systems. DSM could be a form of operating reserve that increases the system reliability and eases the integration of renewable sources. A review of DSM techniques and a list of future challenges are presented. Regarding dynamic pricing, the Author states that “if prices are not sufficiently different, it will be difficult to justify investments on DSM.”
  7. R. Shawa, M. Attreea, T. Jacksonb, M. Kay, “The value of reducing distribution losses by domestic load-shifting: a network perspective”, Energy Policy, Elsevier, Volume 37, Issue 8, pp. 3159-3167, August 2009. This article focuses on the achievable benefits of load shift techniques regarding the reduction of losses in distribution networks and consequent CO2 emissions. The conclusion is that load shedding is more effective that shifting.
  8. S. Braithwait, “Behavior modification”, Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE, Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 36-45, May-June 2010. This paper focuses on Price-Responsive Demand (PRD). This term indicates the “consumer energy demand that is sensitive to conditions of wholesale market”. PRD can be achieved through price or curtailment signals. The first type of mechanism provides advantages for consumers since they can choose to whether or not consume energy, even when the price gets higher; the second type provides advantages for power system operators by giving a greater control over the energy demand. The Author classifies and reviews different types of dynamic pricing tariffs (classified in hourly and daily pricing) and DR programs (classified in economic, reliability, and emergency-based). Dynamic pricing and DR differ on the type of incentive and on the need to measure the load reduction. Results of PRD studies show how consumers respond to price variations.

Household energy consumption models

The following papers present models for the energy consumption in domestic buildings.

1.      A. Capasso, W. Grattieri, R. Lamedica, A. Prudenzi, “A bottom-up approach to residential load modeling”, Transactions of Power Systems, IEEE, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp. 957-964, May 1994. This seminal paper presents a model for household electric energy consumption. By using Montecarlo extraction processes, the energy consumption is obtained with a bottom-up approach over two levels of aggregation: multiple appliances are aggregated into a household unit; multiple household are aggregated in a group of houses. The relation between the operation of appliances and human behavior is modeled by probability functions (behavioral and engineering functions). The presented simulation results validate the model.

2.      R. Yao, K. Steemers, “A method of formulating energy load profile for domestic buildings in the UK”, Energy and Buildings, Elsevier, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp. 663-671, June 2005. This article presents a method for predicting household load profiles. The model takes into account the people’s occupancy pattern. It requires average consumption values as input; load profiles are then generated randomly. Household and regional profiles are obtained by an aggregated approach. The Authors present validation results that show how the consumption of 100 households obtained by the model is close to UK statistical data.

3.      J. V. Paatero, P. D. Lund, “A model for generating household electricity load profiles”, International Journal of Energy Research, Wiley, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp. 273–290, April 2006. This paper presents a simple bottom-up model for household electric energy consumption that uses statistical data as input. The model is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of three different DSM programs in terms of load shift. Results show how allowing cold appliances to shift for 1 hour, a reduction of 7.2% of the annual mean peak is achieved.

4.      I. Richardson, M. Thomson, D. Infield, C. Clifford, “Domestic electricity use: A high-resolution energy demand model”, Energy and Buildings, Elsevier, Volume 42, Issue 10, pp. 1878-1887, October 2010. This paper presents a bottom-up model for energy consumption in households. The model considers the active occupancy of the single households and employs a 1 min time resolution. Simulation results validate the model. The Authors make available an example of the model implemented on a spreadsheet.

Scheduling

The problem of peak shift ultimately consists in scheduling non-periodic tasks, such as appliance operation cycles and the charging of electric vehicles. This problem involves deadlines and may require the rescheduling of already allocated tasks, as well as the interruption of running tasks. In the context of a Demand Response program, the scheduler may use the dynamic pricing as a control signal, so the scheduling objective becomes the minimization of the energy cost. Energy providers may also benefit from the introduction of resource requirements (set the available energy in a time slot) in order to control the peak consumption. The following papers provide a classification and algorithmic approaches for scheduling problems.

1.      T. L. Casavant, J. G. Kuhl, “A taxonomy of scheduling in general-purpose distributed computing systems”, Transactions on Software Engineering, IEEE, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp. 141-154, February 1988. This article resents the scheduling problem, the relevant terminology, and a hybrid taxonomy (mostly hierarchical, but flat for common descriptors) of scheduling systems. Examples taken from the literature are classified with the taxonomy. Finally, an annotated bibliography is presented.

2.      K. Ramamritham, J. A. Stankovic, W. Zhao, “Distributed scheduling of tasks with deadlines and resource requirements”, Transactions on Computers, IEEE, Volume 38, Issue 8, pp. 1110-1123, August 1989. The paper presents different heuristics for real-time scheduling problems with priority, deadlines, and resource requirements, in the context of CPU allocation. The Author distinguishes between periodic and non-periodic tasks. Each node involved in the scheduling problem has three components: a local scheduler, a dispatcher, and a global scheduler.

Miscellaneous

1.      N Gershenfeld, R Krikorian, D Cohen, “The Internet of things”, Scientific American, American Edition, CDS, Vol. 291; Number 4, pp. 76, 2004. This article introduces the motivations and requirements of Internet 0, a low-rate physical layer technology that has the objective to route IP over anything. The benefits of pervasive computing are presented, as well as the motivations for the choosing a low-rate transmission.

2.      N Gershenfeld, D Cohen, “Internet 0: Interdevice Internetworking”, IEEE Circuits and Systems, Vol. 22, Issue 5, pp 48 – 55, 2006. The authors present the principles behind Internet 0: reduction of IP connectivity costs, open standards, distributed architecture that does not require servers (“devices should have the resources to independently implement their functionality”). The physical layer is described (transmission big bits and end-to-end modulation).

3.      SMART 2020: Enabling low carbon economy in the information age”, A report by The Climate Group on behalf of the Global eSustainability Initiative (GeSI), 2008. This report focuses on the relation between the ICT and energy consumption. Several statistics and forecast charts are presented together with suggested actions to achieve a more efficient use of ICT equipment. The study concludes that ICT, counting for approximately 2% of the current carbon footprint, can make a “major contribution to the global response to climate change” by enabling new social behaviors (dematerialization) and by new smart technologies (motor systems, logistics, buildings, grid).

4.      D. J. C. MacKay, “Without hot air”, UIT Cambridge Ltd., 2009. This book addresses the problem of energy consumption, sources of energy, and related policies. The utilization of renewable sources of energy is investigated by using an engineering approach, in order to determine if it is possible to exclusively rely on them. The Author highlights the importance of having meaningful consumption values and identifies actions to promote a better use of the energy resources related to transportation, heating, and electricity use. Demand Response and the utilization of electric vehicles for energy storage can ease the integration of renewables.

5.      A. Berl, R. Weidlich, M. Schrank, H. Hlavacs, and H. de Meer, “Network Virtualization in Future Home Environments”, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management (DSOM09), October 2009. This article presents the Virtual Home Environment (VHE), a peer-to-peer architecture that aims at virtualizing and consolidating end-user ITC residential resources (CPU, storage, and network) over multiple houses. Several issues related to the virtualization of the network (by a peer-to-peer overlay that relies on home gateway for continuous connectivity) and of the host system (resource availability) are described. A download sharing application is used to evaluate the network virtualization overhead.

Smart Grid, Demand Side Management, and related technologies: white papers and technical reports

  1. UtilityAMI 2008 Home Area Network System Requirements Specification”, Open Smart Grid - OpenHAN Task Force of the UtilityAMI Working Group, August 2008.
  2. Energy Efficiency Trends in Residential and Commercial Buildings”, U.S. department of Energy, October 2008.
  3. ZigBee Smart Energy Profile™ 2.0 Technical Requirements Document”, ZigBee Alliance and HomePlug Powerline Alliance liaison, December 2009.
  4. K. Wacks, “Requirements”, GridWise Architecture Council / NIST – Home-to-Grid Domain Expert Working Group, April 2009.
  5. PowerCentsDC™ Program Interim Report - November 2009”, technical report prepared by eMeter Strategic Consulting for the Smart Meter Pilot Program Inc., November 2009.

a.       Related CNET News article.

  1. The Smart Grid: an introduction”, prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy by Litos Strategic Communication, 2009.
  2. Demand Response Measurement & Verification – Applications for Load Research”, AEIC Load Research Committee, Association of Edison Illuminating Companies, March 2009.
  3. R. Hendron, C. Engebrecht, “Building America Research Benchmark Definition”, Technical Report, Updated December 2009, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, January 2010.
  4. NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0”, NIST Special Publication, NISR, January 2010.
  5. R. Perry, K. Wacks, “Creating a Robust Market for Residential Energy Management through an Open Energy Management Architecture”, CableLabs, February 2010.
  6. PowerCentsDC™ Program Final Report”, Prepared by eMeter Strategic Consulting for the Smart Meter Pilot Program, Inc., September 2010.
ADDRESS Project

This project is co- founded by the European Commission under the 7th FP. ADDRESS stands for Active Distribution network with full integration of Demand and distributed energy RESourceS. The project focuses on enabling the Active Demand in the context of the Smart Grids of the future.

1.      E. Peeters, R. Belhomme, C. Batlle, F. Bouffard, S. Karkkainen, D. Six, M. Hommelberg, “ADDRESS: Scenarios and architecture for Active Demand development in the smart grids of the future”, Proceedings of the International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED2009), September 2009. This paper introduces the ADDRESS project and identifies potential barriers for active demand with the relative proposed solutions.

2.      ADDRESS: Technical and Commercial Conceptual Architectures – Core document”, Deliverable D1.1, ADDREESS Project, October 2009.

Smart-A Project

Smart-A is an European project that aims at “identifying and evaluating the potential synergies that arise from coordinating energy demand of domestic appliances with local sustainable energy generation but also with the requirements of regional load management in electricity networks.”

  1. Synergy Potential of Smart Appliances”, Deliverable 2.3 of WP2, Smart-A Project, 2008.
  2. Costs and Benefits of Smart Appliances in Europe”, Deliverable 7.2 of WP7, Smart-A Project, 2009.
  3. Smart Domestic Appliances Supporting the System Integration of Renewable Energy”, Public final report, Smart-A Project, November 2009.
  4. Value of Smart Domestic Appliances in Stressed Electricity Networks”, Deliverable 4.4 of WP4, Smart-A Project, 2009.
EDISON Project

EDISON (Electric vehicles in a Distributed and Integrated market using Sustainable energy and Open Networks) is an international project that focuses on “developing optimal system solutions for EV system integration, including network issues, market solutions, and optimal interaction between different energy technologies.”

1.      C. Binding, D. Gantenbein, J. Bernhard, O. Sundström, P. B. Andersen, F. Marra, B. Poulsen, C. Træholt, “Electric Vehicle Fleet Integration in the Danish EDISON Project - A Virtual Power Plant on the Island of Bornholm”, EDISON project research report, IBM Research – Zurich, DTU Technical University of Denmark, January 2010. This paper presents a SOA-based software for the integration of vehicle-to-grid technologies.

2.      The EDISON picture”, EDISON project definitions document, WP7, November 2010.

Zpryme Research & Consulting white papers
  1. Smart Grid Insights: Smart Appliances”, Zpryme Research & Consulting, 2010.
  2. Smart Grid Insights: AMI”, Zpryme Research & Consulting, 2010.
  3. Smart Grid: 2010 U.S. Project Spending”, Zpryme Research & Consulting, 2010.
  4. The Electric Vehicle Study”, Zpryme Research & Consulting, 2010.